Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>> I use an Omega B8. It will also do 6x9. >That's what I used back when I did wet printing. It is a great enlarger. I can vouch for that, absolutely. I can also confirm that if carefully disassembled and shipped, the Omegas reassemble at the other end easily and retain their regidity and alignment (this is not always the case for all enlargers). This place: http://www.classic-enlargers.com/ is a great resource for them. I second Slobodan's comments both about most Beseler 23s needing a rebuild and about the Saunders/LPL enlargers seeming flat-ish. Most of my 'grade 3' 35mm negs need grade 3.5-4 on an LPL, leaving you little room to go up in case of an accidentally flat neg. I'd imagine you could easily get something for much less than you indicate the Saunders/LPL is going for, particularly living in the US. Durst M70s are tremendous and Dante's suggestion of a 605 is also very good. Make sure you get your neg carriers with your enlarger unless you already have a source with parts - they are increasingly hard to find for out-of-production machines (e.g. *all* Dursts). A VC or colour head is unnecessary but nice. Below the lens gel VC filters work just fine and you can dodge with them, providing a useful amount of local contrast control. If you keep them clean and dry they will not degrade image quality. Big prints from good 6x7 negs are a joy to behold and carefully made Acros, TMX and Delta 100 negs can have you fooling your friends you have gone seriously big with large format. Send us the invite to the show. Marty