Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I got into zooms later in the mid 80's and was ok sticking with brand names but avoiding third party glass. I forgot I was given out of pity a 135 3.5 Nikkor at day one for me in the late 70's. It didn't seem to have much of a coating maybe it wore off in the rain. I could sell it for 33 bucks. Or use it to great effect when I get a full frame body. Mine was an earlier version than this. http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/135f35.htm Mark William Rabiner > From: Roger Hart <rhart76 at gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:40:47 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Postcards from Detroit > > Mark, > > You are correct. As a newspaper and wire service photographer, the 180 was > a > prime lens. I never went on an assignment without it. I bought an early 35 > to 135 zoom that had a variable aperture, and I quickly got rid of it. > > Roger > >