Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard, Are you using the same scanner for both formats? I noticed the same thing and I think that the Epson flatbed scanner shows the dust less than the Minolta Scan Dual II that I was using for 35mm. Since I don't have room for both on my desk anyway, I'm now using the flatbed for everything. I'm pretty pleased with the results. I think the light source on the flatbed is more diffused than on the dedicated film scanner and this affects the perception of dust. Mike D Richard Man wrote: > OK, I developed 2 rolls of 120 and 2 rolls of 220 already. My development > method is the same - XTol using a Jobo, sink water (too lazy to get > distilled water) etc. but is it my imagination that the bigger negs are > cleaner? I don't think it's just the magnification factor issue. I blow up > the scan and the bigger negs just have less stuff on it?! Is my eyes > deceiving me?! > > >