Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The H backs are very different to the V back. Remember the V back is quite a number of years old, whereas the D3x is brand new. Most reviewers and experts agree that the D3x is the best 24x36 system camera by some margin. I can tell you from my own experience of the V back and D3x that the D3x has superior resolution; equal acuity; better color accuracy; slightly better dynamic range, and of course is useable above ISO 200. YMMV...but personally, I'd take a D3x over the V back if I needed the resolution, and a H3D 65 over all of those. Technology moves on... On May 28, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > Very few people of any circumstance would agree with medium format > digital > being wiped the floor with any 24x36 format camera system > regardless of > "resolution". > It has just no basis in logic or practice or anything else. > Experience. > Testing. Results. > > There is a reason why top pros for top jobs rent Hasselblad H's and > V's. > They and their art directors and editors are not idiots who should be > listening to discerning advice from guys who buy and sell cameras > systems > back and forth endlessly on eBay on camera gear chat lists. > > Unless it was in the respect of somebody who felt starting from in > the area > of film that Leica shooting wiped the floor of Hasselblad use. > That the > results were not worth the speed and spontaneity loss. > And then we are talking about spontaneity and speed issues not > quality of > image issues. And rather narrow mindedly. Sure some 35mm shooters have > gotten by with never shooting medium format. > But For decades both commercial photographers as well as > photojournists and > who ever else have known there are times the quality of image > demands a > larger format than what they normally might use. > > For some reason what comes to mind is Jim Marshall famous Leica > rock and > roll and jazz shooter who showed us stuff taken with rented Blads. > Jean-Loup Sieff you'd' think never parted with his Leica and 21 super > Angulon. > There's no difference with digital capture. > Acreage is pretty much always going to be the bottom line. > > > Mark William Rabiner > THEIN Onn Ming *photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com www.flickr.com/mingthein