Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Thanks Mark. I need to get a big printer. Shot at f4 if I remember > correctly. I do find myself wanting a bit more speed sometimes > though - more for the isolation at middle distances (isolation with > context?) rather than low light ability. Have to agree with your > assessment of CV; problem is, there are some lenses that Leica just > doesn't make like the 12 and 15 heliars (the WATE doesn't count - > it's HUGE!) and the 35 Nokton. Get the 15 if you can. The M mount > version I have seems better than the LTM version I tested, but it > could be due to tolerances in the adaptor (saw some decentering) > rather than a problem with the glass itself. I believe the optical > design is the same. > > Ming > > On May 26, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> I'm very fond of the shot the busyness is the main point of the shot; >> Less busy; Less shot. >> And it this higher resolution on the screen I can almost start to >> really >> appreatate the amazingness of the 35mm Summicron ASPH. An >> astounding ground >> breaking optic. >> Would love to see this shot printed 17x22". >> A bit high key for me this rendition you might want to see if the >> shot reads >> more satisfyingly with a slightly more richer tonality. Darker. >> Nice blacks >> though. >> The Summicron name to me and lots of people is the main Leica >> brand and what >> Leica is all about. But we usually have a Summilux 1.4 option. >> A Summicron being a Summicron; and a Summilux being a Summilux. >> Personally I find f1.4 to be an SLR thing and f 2 to be very much a >> rangefinder thing. >> In the case of the 35 you can't even tell the lenses apart till >> you see the >> labels. Same filter size; same shape almost the same weight. The >> 1.4 just >> cost another grand. USD. >> This looks like a 5.6 shot to me though. >> And its not as if f1.4 helps you see through the viewfinder better >> and snap >> the image on the groundless more reassuringly. No groundglass. >> Leica m. >> [snip] THEIN Onn Ming *photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com www.flickr.com/mingthein