Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gene the crop factor didn't stop any body very long from getting into digital who wanted to stay in the business in 2003. I went out an bought a 14mm 2.8 and called it even it didn't slow me up. But in the past very few years all the top people as well as medium rare people as well as anyone with two legs who can walk are shooting full 24x36 format. Cropped format, 1.5x or 1.6x is quickly being seen as a Daddy picture format for casual shooting. Very popular. As DSLR's out sell point and shoots. But on a commercial job or many another kind of job, its getting to be a rare bird. Even people who mainly use very long teles have bit the bullet and gone full frame. Its not because its the newest catch phrase. The latest thing you gotta have. Its because of the results. And the usability at ISO's far beyond mortal men. The way big prints look. We can say "no I don't need to be looking through my AF lenses" We don't need AF; we don't need SLR's. But saying we don't need to be shooting full frame will soon be an impossible sell. The cameras are virtually the same size. Its not the difference between a speed graphic and a Rollei. Or a Leica and a Hasselblad. Its the same basic system. But Non clipped features. Why didn't they make more Leica 72's? Mark William Rabiner > From: <grduprey at mchsi.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:59:39 +0000 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] "good enough" (was: a quick hello) > > Mark, > > This crop factor argument is just an excuse for not moving to Digital, or > from > a film M to digital M. Nothing more. > > Cheers, > Gene