Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FW: Friedlander & Madonna: Switcheroo..
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:37:17 -0700
References: <7ablht$401d1e@pd5mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca> <BLU0-SMTP12F5BB174F0072D1FD870C8C6D0@phx.gbl> <050120090323.23522.49FA6B39000C934100005BE2223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

$37.5K is cheap?

I am jealous... I wish I could sell some garbage photos for this kind of 
cash.......  forget the topic of a nude.....  

I have seen a lot of stuff that I consider garbage, in collections like the 
Getty, MOMA, and others.  Big prints, probably big bucks.  I really wonder 
if art collectors and gallery owners, and Museums actually have anyone on 
staff that knows the difference between something worthwhile and something 
that is worthless... worthless in the sense of intrinsic value, qualitative 
value, or otherwise quality in general.

Cash for Crap.

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net


I also agree, it is total garbage, any way i look at it. Looks like a cheap 
snapshot.


Gene





Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] FW: Friedlander & Madonna: Switcheroo..)
In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] FW: Friedlander & Madonna: Switcheroo..)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] FW: Friedlander & Madonna: Switcheroo..)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] FW: Friedlander & Madonna: Switcheroo..)