Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/04/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Not cricket
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:41:56 -0500
References: <mailman.548.1239037686.976.lug@leica-users.org> <38024DC0-B437-4F35-8D97-7AD5BF06582F@optonline.net> <8A8895E5-3743-443D-BE56-8E94FDDE1AD5@cox.net> <3cad89990904061821v73038e0djd6f209887754d4c9@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189160904061840v12b1b9bcl1df616ab7176a16c@mail.gmail.com> <A8314541-98C4-4EEC-AC9F-A864598B31F8@frozenlight.eu>
Don't the U's claim
that these high coach salaries
and stadium costs
reap large sums for general operating funds?
No idea if true.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Not cricket)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Not cricket)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Not cricket)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Not cricket)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Not cricket)