Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW 04
From: mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope)
Date: Sun Feb 8 11:45:59 2009
References: <1be504db0902061321o6346f9feu1bdadeb727dfd87f@mail.gmail.com>

Ric,
I agree with Phil.  It's a cracking shot.  I think it would also lend 
itself well to a B&W conversion.

Cheers

Mark



Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK

Homepage               http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog                   http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2009)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
                (2008) 
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008


Phil Swango wrote:
> Ric Carter wrote:
> I've had split feelings on the crop of this one.
> 
> My first feeling was for the looser.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/PAW2009/04/04-makeover.jpg.html>
> http://tinyurl.com/dd3kcn
> 
> As time went on, I started thinking of tightening. It still strikes me
> as a bit claustrophobic, but that may be what it needs.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/PAW2009/04/04-
> makeoverC2.jpg.html>
> http://tinyurl.com/aasnloer wrote:
> ============================================
> 
> I liked the looser one, Ric.  More appealing graphically, provides some
> context, and doesn't make the 2-faces connection quite as obvious.
> 

In reply to: Message from pswango at att.net (Phil Swango) ([Leica] PAW 04)