Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:49 AM 1/4/2009, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: >The reaction to Cuba predates any Marxist carbuncle. While currently >seeming irrational to Europeans, the attitude is firmly grounded in a >long standing interventionist position, or point of view. >Self determination, within a people who are perceived as a subject >people, is usually seen as a disease which needs to be cauterized. >The Caribbean has been a hot bed of self determination from the very >beginning. With Haiti and Cuba leading the charge. >When I was in the service, I remember Gen. Westmoreland being taken >out of Viet Nam and given the Southern Command. I thought that at the >time it was a demotion. But in spit of the Asian hot conflict, the >Southern Command position was considered more important, hence a reward. Two quick points. The US split with Castro came over his nationalization of US assets without compensation. Castro seized all US-owned assets in Cuba, roughly 60% of the economy. The US insisted that at least SOME payment be made. He refused. This led to the US embargo. The US has always offered to lift the embargo if recompense be made. Castro's Bolshie tendencies have nothing to do with it. Second, I can find no reference to Westmoreland ever serving as the Commander of Southern Command. He returned from Viet-Nam to immediately serve as the US Army Chief of Staff. Or, at least, the US Army Center for Military History seems to have no record of Westmoreland ever serving as commander of Southern Command. Was he carried from Saigon to Miami in a black helicopter? <he grins> Marc msmall@aya.yale.edu Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!