Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Thu Oct 30 23:18:10 2008
References: <370105078.1342501225386721152.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu><24709389.1342711225386756932.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <20081030134943.663bcf30@linux-019a.site> <702B2A09F79E44CDBC14461F0A029272@dadquad>
I agree with the improvement using the 1.25 ( I do not have a 1.4, but
believe it will work as well....)
However, the 1.4 costs as much as almost any other manufacturer's SLR 50mm
lens.... !
I guess glass is glass at Leica...
Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net
The magnifiers are VERY helpful with critical DoF on the 50 and up wide open
as well.
Replies:
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)
Reply from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Auxiliary VF on the M3?)
In reply to:
Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)