Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Olympus Pen Ft
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Mon Oct 27 13:35:04 2008
References: <B8B42CC3A8304F65BA414612264BF925@Family> <69975C1BE9D946FD84A5D92FCBE4BF4E@dadquad> <75B2CF5C-0AB1-49CE-95B1-5C871428CB5E@frozenlight.eu> <D124D872-76FB-4287-AFC3-2A20FA449E9F@protozoic.com> <4BD69D91-A0DE-435E-A4A1-FCC2182EF055@frozenlight.eu>
On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> While I realize that the real speed of Neopan 1600 is less than the
> nominal speed, my experience with it is far better than with either
> TMZ or Delta 3200. Large parts of my Seville gallery was done with
> Neopan 1600 (www.frozenlight.eu/fotosevilla).
That last sentence of mine should have read "It's better at 1600..."
Very nice photos. Neopan 1600 looks like a great film, but sometimes
that extra speed is handy if you can put up with the grain. And
sometimes, I like the extra grain :)
In reply to:
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from tgray at protozoic.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)