Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: screaming children meet john
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue Sep 16 16:11:18 2008
References: <40FA2CEF-4194-44C7-A595-5CCA9B8AB469@mac.com> <002c01c91849$3ab96e80$80f510ac@chris0436b6050> <C40DB02D-17FA-48C2-8B84-649ADA37A5A4@embarqmail.com> <200809162247.BAH09780@rg5.comporium.net> <E8F826DF-3BBB-4F6D-A1D4-2BF41801C1FD@mac.com> <200809162257.AZF11389@rg4.comporium.net>
 
What about soft lighting and retouching to make him look young and  
vigorous?

Are we reacting because the cover photo is LESS manipulated than most  
covers?

  What mag covers are unmanipulated? Are Cosmo covers "illustrations?"

ric




On Sep 16, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> And that's fine.  If they are labeled ILLUSTRATIONS!!  Not  
> photographs.  "Illustration by Jill Greenberg" would have been fine.  
> Not that anybody would notice the distinction except editorial  
> photographers (not illustrators). :-(
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] screaming children meet john)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Chris Williams) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)