Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Assuming that we're discussing photographs and photographers seriously pursuing the art and craft; what, exactly, does "nothing there" mean? It's one thing to have a predilection for social documentary photography; and quite another thing to imagine other visual subjects and approaches as having "nothing" of value for the viewer; not to mention the various approaches within the medium's historical context. For me, as a photographer and lover of photographs, social documents candid or formal portraits wildlife studies landscapes cloud studies macro and micro studies architectural studies sports studies so called fine art photographs cutting, bleeding edge photographs (what am I may be missing?) oh nudes (of course) and even advertising photographs all have practitioners ranging from Extraordinary to Mediocre. Some achieve a consistent high level of craft; a smaller number consistently reach for and achieve Art. Each will benefit from the finest possible printing techniques, papers and other relevant materials. Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Sep 8, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > If there is nothing there to begin with