Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Analog Processing
From: marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Fri Sep 5 12:31:15 2008
References: <48C15C9B.9090200@comcast.net> <368940.20584.qm@web55904.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
 
At 02:28 PM 9/5/2008, H. Ball Arche wrote:
 >Gotta agree with Ernie on this one Marc. While dedicated to film, I
 >haven't had my hand in Dektol for years (well, except when I'm
 >teaching my students). I'd guess the percentage working analog from
 >start to end product is, unfortunately, much lower than your figures.

Alas, H, for your speculations, but these are not 
"my" figures:  they are the figures discussed 
frequently on this List and on the IDCC and 
similar fora.  That you do not use Dektiol proves 
nothing:  my wife has never used Dektol in her 
entire life.  So what?  I don't use 
lipstick:  does this mean that the cosmetic industry is collapsing?

Marc


msmall@aya.yale.edu
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
Replies: Reply from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Analog Processing)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Analog Processing)
 In reply to: Message from charcot at comcast.net (charcot) ([Leica] Analog Processing)
Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] Analog Processing)