Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Classic plane - Ju 52
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Sat Aug 16 10:41:50 2008
References: <804784.88842.qm@web55909.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

H-Ball

Yes I can . I am not aeronautically inclined, but have fallen all the 
way. I am a graduate aerospace engineer with 55 years of
experience.  Reasons why engines  are non-parallel may be;

    Structurally easier to design engine mounts

    Less apt to go into a spin if one of the wing engines dies.  the 
outboard pointing thrust vector partially compensates the
    natural tendency to turn/spin into the dead engine.

Jerry Lehrer


H. Ball Arche wrote:
> I'd seen one of these in the air often in the '70's around Gainesville, it 
> was owned by Martin Caiden, but I'd never noticed that the wing engines 
> are mounted perpendicular to the leading edge, and clearly skewed off 
> parallel from the axis of flight.  Can one of the aeronautically inclined 
> explain why?
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/132098-1/20080816-_MG_8190.jpg
>
>   


Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Classic plane - Ju 52)
In reply to: Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] IMG: Classic plane - Ju 52)