Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Hello Luggers, If you look at the specs for the Micro 4/3rds system in the dpreview article M lenses would easily fit on the camera via an adaptor ( upon which I am sure some Chinese entrepreneur is already diligently working in his Shanghai garage). With live view you would have no parallax framing problems and could view 100% of the image. I know, I know, this is no substitute for the traditional rangefinder viewfinder but it could prove useful and entertaining to use. And if the micro body were, say, US$1000, it could satisfy the desire for a digital CLE without cannibalizing M8 sales (too much - maybe - since the cheap camera won't have the traditional rangefinder viewfinder). The numbers - 4/3rd Micro flange back distance - 20mm (M flange back distance 27.95mm - lots of room for an adaptor). 4/3rd Micro Lens mount diameter 44mm (M mount 40mm - again lots of room to fit in any M lens. In my opinion the deal breaker will be how good the EV viewfinder is. That was a very bad part of the original Panasonic LC1 / Leica Digilux 2 which was otherwise a very capable and easy to use camera (in good light). Food for thought - isn't it? Howard (hot on Pender Island today) > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:44:38 -0400 > From: "David Rodgers" <drodgers@casefarms.com> > Subject: [Leica] Micro FourThirds > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08080501microfourthirds.asp#press > > I found the naming a bit interesting. Nothing "micro" about a shorter > flange distance, smaller lens mount, or two more contact points. Maybe > it just sounds photoish like Micro-Nikkor. They should have called > it HD > FourThirds. The HD for Half Distance but people would have assumed it > meant High Definition (and who in their right mind doesn't want that)! > > OTOH, make a camera with a four thirds chip that looks and handles > like > this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leica_CL or this > http://www.contaxcameras.co.uk/gseries/gseries.asp and you can call it > whatever you want. I'm sold already. Olympus or Panaleica certainly > know > how to make small, high performance, fast primes. > > Please don't make us rely on Live View for framing. I don't want a > glorified P&S. I want an optical viewfinder, although the rangefinder > can be electronic (i.e. LED). > > DaveR