Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I've seen breathtaking imagery taken with UV and IR photography. >Should those images be ignored?! I don't get it! I have seen some great work too and of course great photos done any way should not be ignored. The problem to me is that far too much UV and IR work is pedestrian, but touted as 'special' or 'great' just because the person has used that specific technique. Similarly I breathed a sigh of relief when Tech Pan was discontinued because there were always some students and others who thought their work was special because the used that film. To some extent this is a problem with all photography that uses unusual materials. I have done it myself and made a lot of portriats on hand-coated watercolour paper in the late 90s and early 2000s. It was extremely popular and profitable, but I never really liked it. The bills got paid, however. >I'd love to be able to do some. I got a very dark dark red IR filter once >from B+W but never gave it much of a shot. Digital seems like the way to fly >for this stuff. Absolutely. I've used and processed hundreds of rolls of HIE and EIR for IR work and and they were a total pain. Fuji RTP for UV was easier but still problematic. I even built UV and IR meters and an IR previewing device to standardise the process. Digital means you can make sure you get the shot with none of the hassle. One of our microscopes is even set up so you can flick a switch, lower a filter and away you go, UV, IR or flourescence images. I wish there was a modern digital camera with a monochrome sensor so I could more easily replicate the highlight rendition of HIE without having to resort to HDR techniques. I wish this often and for a number of reasons. Marty Gallery: http://gallery.leica-users.org/main.php?g2_itemId=7617 -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com