Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>A NYT explanation, sort of, regarding why there aren't more small >cameras with big sensors. > >The "noise-free nighttime shots" is quite a statement. I didn't know >there was such a thing as noise-free? I thought there was just "less >apparent noise". OTOH, I haven't used the camera so what do I know? > >FWIW: > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/technology/personaltech/24pogue.html?e >m&ex=1217476800&en=2e2ca0b8c5312110&ei=5087%0A > >http://tinyurl.com/5ts5bc > > This camera has been commented on here before; under ideal conditions it can take great pictures. The 4.6 Mp are just adequate for some purposes, but the quality is very good. It's hardly 'no noise'. In fact, it's not much better than the Fuji f30 in that regard, and while the Fuji is no paragon in user friendliness, it beats the Sigma in every possible way except manual controls. At the lowest sensitivity, the Sigma is definitely 'low noise', but not outstandingly so. I still believe a small camera about the size of an Olympus XA with an APS-C sized sensor could be readily built, with a fixed 35mm or 40mm f/2.8 lens, a good RAW buffer and excellent responsiveness could be built and marketed for the price of the Sigma. The Foveon sensor is nice, but it can't save a camera that is otherwise and embarrassment. One weekend with one was enough. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com