Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 03:29 PM 7/12/2008, you wrote: >Alex, > >Another thing I would like to say. As a photographer, I am after >STORIES. The older the face the deeper the story. It's as simple as >that. Poverty is photogenic precisely because people who have access >to computers, who go to museums, who buy Leicas are not poor. Also, >for me, photographing inside an air conditioned shopping mall, taking >pictures of the housewife with her kids shopping, or the corpulent >masses consuming electronics, for me leaves me empty. Taking photos of >the known is not what I am after. That is why I do not shoot in >America. For me there is nothing to photograph. Call me crazy, but >that is my view of reality. > >Eric Boehm Eric - For all of your reasons, I think it is fine to photograph one segment of society and not try to show every class and every age. I like to photograph the elderly and children because they are less self-conscious about being photographed. They are more able to be themselves and forget the camera instead of posing and trying to fit someone else's idea of what they should be. I find the upper classes in developing countries to be very boring to photograph. In general, their aim is to be homogeneous - exactly what they think families are like on television. However!! I am constantly asked for stock photographs that show middle and upper class people in developing countries going about everyday activities. They could be people anywhere, in any country, but that's what many textbooks and magazines want to show these days. As you say - shopping in malls, eating in fast food establishments, buying electronics - to show that there are no problems in the world and we all have equal opportunities, I suppose. Tina Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com