Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Mar 3 10:12:04 2008
References: <20080302223928.63377D7B@resin15.mta.everyone.net> <290D28E6-3A1C-4862-A13D-C4A8200DE35C@bigpond.net.au> <3cad89990803030211q3b1d96e9n2cd7c3973a7d2b91@mail.gmail.com> <BB95CA64-2518-4B81-98F3-AEB002A29EAC@cox.net> <3cad89990803030714i3f7723c6i1b7d25e77407f65d@mail.gmail.com> <435A5CFF-7C94-43E7-A599-3F73206CF221@cox.net>
exposure on a sensor = critical. All one need do to prove this:
expose the same scene at 1/2 stop variations and view the RAW files.
One of the set will have the best highlight details while holding
shadows (within the dynamic range of the sensor being tested).
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
> Anyone ?
Replies:
Reply from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Shutter Curtain Repair)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW)
In reply to:
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin@afirkin.com) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW)