Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] re: does process matter
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Feb 11 13:43:39 2008
References: <107794.43529.qm@web55906.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
 
There was actually a time when I did a few pin registered masks in  
the enlarger for contrast control.
Also played with making new master negatives so wouldn't have to redo  
the dodging and burning in a print edition.
Also did pencil retouching on negatives for portraits.


On Feb 11, 2008, at 1:14 PM, H. Ball Arche wrote:

> I always thought of 'stripping' as the beginning of PS: rubylith  
> overlays, pin registered sheets of goldenrod, opaqueing ink, exacto  
> knives, etc.

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] re: does process matter)
 In reply to: Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] re: does process matter)