Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Have you noticed that about the horizon too? :-) Harrison McClary wrote: > Yeah...true Walt...I also knew many of them in the 80's now that I > think about it...maybe the thing is they at least kept the horizon > straight. LOL > > I guess I always liked the look of longer lenses better, it cleans up > the background, makes things snap more due to a more limited DOF and > also keeps you from being IN YOUR FACE close. Sometimes a 20 is > nice...but as a standard lens? > > I remember when I was still wet behind the years I went to a Flying > Short Course in Florida, Alex Webb was talking and showing his > work...he mentioned most of the shots from Haiti were shot with a 35mm > lens...I never liked that lens before. When I got home I stuck my 35 > on my FM2 and made myself shoot with it...forcing myself to NOT use my > 20. After a few weeks it became my favorite lens...still is one of my > favorites...wide enough to get you close, long enough to keep you from > being too close. Combine that with a 90/100/105 and a 180 and you > really can photograph just about anything. > > > > Walt Johnson wrote: >> Harrison >> >> I don't think you assesment of new shooters/wide angle is accurate. I >> saw a lot of wide-angle obsessive compulsives in the 70's. > >