Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Charles: Thanks for your kind comments. The lack of photo credit was a simple mistake, and they fixed it on the Web once I reminded them. I'll live. I get paid, anyway. They know me primarily as a writer. The editor simply forgot that I'd taken the photo. He told me that it was such a good shot, he thought it was a professional publicity still. As you say, just the rush of putting together a small paper with a small staff. --Peter At 12:07 PM 1/11/2008 -0800, Charles Hehl wrote: >Congratulation on a great article and nice photo. It is always nice to get >credit, but unfortunately it often gets lost in the rush to publish. I have >found it is very hard to get something changed as there is generally little >interest in revisions...everyone is now working on their next big project. > >I have had this happen quite often...particularly with web photos...and have >never been successful in getting changes made. I suppose one could sue, but >you would never work again. > >In any case, again congratulations. > >Charles Hehl >Pottstown, PA >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter Klein" <pklein@2alpha.net> >To: <lug@leica-users.org> >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:25 PM >Subject: [Leica] IMG: Peter's latest article > > > > > > My most recent article was published today. It includes a photograph I > > took, which you will recognize if you read the "I shot an actor" thread a > > couple of weeks ago. The paper neglected to give me photo credit--that > > might be fixed on the Web later. > > > > The actor I interviewed and photographed has created a one-man show about > > the cabaret that existed at the Westerbork concentration camp in Holland > > during World War II. Here's a link. > > > > <http://www.jtnews.net/index.php?/news/item/3817/C48/> > > > > --Peter