Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Sorry George, but...
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Wed Dec 12 11:28:09 2007
References: <4760270B.5090602@waltjohnson.com> <4D41EE45-CEB7-454C-8A13-FE7BF49AD8E7@mac.com> <EE899789-E1F0-4374-81FF-C4A8A10AC32B@mindspring.com> <66300224-6B69-4058-AFB7-FBF481CAE381@mac.com> <CD5ED750-E061-42FE-A19C-5FC4959ED70A@mindspring.com>
Right.
Yet, in the case of the quoted text from the review, it seemed to
"me" the minimum to clearly communicate the relationship of her
comment to our "avant-garde" discussion. However, you found it too
long. And if you'd not had enough interest to use the link to full
text, or even if you did go the full text, perhaps her text would not
have held you long enough to get to the meat I intended. ;~
( Arriving at the correct balance - not an easy task.
Thanks again for helping out.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Dec 12, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Ric Carter wrote:
> that's the miracle of links--each reader can reach as deeply as
> they like.
Replies:
Reply from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Sorry George, but...)
In reply to:
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Sorry George, but...)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Sorry George, but...)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Sorry George, but...)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Sorry George, but...)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Sorry George, but...)