Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge'
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 8 08:59:17 2007
References: <C7662BC1-A7C7-40D5-BD2B-5FFE1D1FE575@pandora.be> <DAE481B0-645D-4EC1-BC34-E2A272CA4083@mac.com> <6AB0AFE1-B2B6-4169-B6D4-432F3C273C5C@mac.com> <475A4563.5050009@nathanfoto.com>
We could add it to the list.
Yet, I can imagine a soulful photographer doing work on the subject
of "shock."
The list I provided tries for brevity and simplicity, without
censoring possibilities.
Moreover, the responses to this thread clearly indicates that each
individual has their own list.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Dec 8, 2007, at 1:18 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> "does not rely on shock value alone" (unless that is covered by
> your item 1).
In reply to:
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')