Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT Canon G9
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Tue Sep 25 19:13:18 2007
References: <59FFD0BF-A930-4FB9-9026-282393E61ED2@cox.net> <257123FE-2BC6-4FB5-B67E-3944F9B4993E@pandora.be> <20070925200644.6302B2FBA7@donald.hostspirit.ch> <A81BA438-04D8-4B52-BA49-3F75221D0F3F@pandora.be> <d8b7a3c7a2a4e672e2e178d827d46dcc@comcast.net> <EBA273C5-D809-494A-AC6D-0C16936E6AE1@mac.com> <302611a60709251856k2e6e2f92sdda7a2ab043f5512@mail.gmail.com>
Our very first digital camera, the Olympus C3000, died after 3 years...
At 06:56 PM 9/25/2007, Allen Graves wrote:
>Interesting question, George. None of my digital cameras have died. I
>was thinking of all the film P&S cameras I've had over the years (
>olympus stylus,etc.) and, unless memory fails me, their death was
>almost always related to the film transport mechanism. Is there a
>pattern here? Or am I just one unusual user?
>
>Allen
>
>On 9/25/07, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote:
> > I've never had a digital camera "die." Have others?
> >
> > Regards,
> > George Lottermoser
> > george@imagist.com
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
please use richard at imagecraft.com)
In reply to:
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)
Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)
Message from allen.graves at charter.net (Allen Graves) ([Leica] OT Canon G9)