Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with Gene. I have the 35/2, 50/2 and 90/2. From a subjective viewpoint, these have the same "look" as the M lenses from the same period. In other words, I can't tell which system was used in the photos (this includes the color cast). I also have the 21/4 SA but don't have the M equivalent. I agree with Gene about the 200/4 Telyt. And for really spectacular results, the 280/2.8 APO with extenders and close up adapter. Haven't really seen anything with which to compare this lens.. If the current R mount is viable into the future (well, they are with adapters to the Canon series at least), there are some real bargains out there. Regards, Bill Larsen grduprey@mchsi.com wrote: >Hi Jack, > >Well I have not used them all but those I have used are every bit as good >as their M counterparts. I currently have the 24 Elmarit R, 35 Elmarit R, >90 Elmarit R, 135 Elmarit, 200/4 Telyt (OK not really an R lens, but this >Visoflex lens is really nice on the R cameras), 560 Telyt, and the 80 - 200 >Vario Elmar R. Would not give any up. > >