Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Crumplers seem to elicit two kind of responses: you love them or hate > them. I am in the latter category when it comes to photo bags (sorry > Hoppy). I really tried to like them, because I love the quirky web site, > and the whole Aussie image of the company. But every time I have had > one, I ended up selling it because I invariably found that it was way > too big on the outside compared to what it could hold inside. Way too > much protection. For my Olympus outfit, I use my all-time favourite, the > Domke 803 with Kata dividers cut exactly to my taste; for the Canon > outfit I use one of the new Presstop Billinghams, also with Kata > dividers cut to taste. My beef with Billingham used to be that they were > difficult to work out of, but the Presstop has changed that, and all the > other attributes of the Billingham (great craftmanship, indestructible > etc.) are still there. > > Having said the above, I bought my daughter a Crumpler bag for school > this year, and it is very nice. Holds her books and papers, plus the > school-issued 15 inch laptop. Similar to the Timbuk2 bag I use for the > office every day. > > When I want to carry a lot of stuff, I use a large Domke bag (cannot > remember the name) which is big enough to hold my Canon outfit plus > papers plus the G4 Powerbook in the front pocket. But this is not a load > to walk around with all day. > > Nathan > The problem with Crumpler is they don't Crumpler. Too much padding. Domke's rule. At B&H all you see are the Ballistic ones. The reason I finally got told is they think the canvas ones shed stuff into your digital camera. I like both. But its a mixed bag. I think its good to have a gamut of sizes. But I'm going ballistic. Starting to like the ballistic more than the canvas. Mark William Rabiner rabinergroup.com