Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 Discussion
From: amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu)
Date: Fri Aug 31 11:18:45 2007

On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:

> What I would like to see is a comparison of the M8 with a film
> Leica, say the M6, using the same lenses on each, the film to be
> scanned at 4000 lpi on a top quality scanner.
............................................................................................................................................
For me, this is a moot point.  Except for posting to the LUG Gallery,  the
scanned image is secondary to the original.  I enjoy looking at my Kodachrome
slides primarily with a loupe, or projected, as a second choice, rather than 
on
a computer screen or print.  It's fun to wander among the fabulous details 
and
never see square pixels, no matter the magnification.  And if I can't get 
time
to make prints from B&W, in the mean time seeing the negative is pleasure
enough.

[My car is a '90 Geo Prizm, not a '50's model]

Alan (Who loves RF's; would use an M8 if he had one)

Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
University Information Technology Services
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Office Phone: 414 229-6525 | E-mail: amr3@uwm.edu
Department Phone: 414 229-4282
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] M8 Discussion)