Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/08/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why the sumarit-M lens?
From: leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Thu Aug 30 02:09:28 2007
References: <2EB8FC93F378FF146CEF565E@hindolveston.reid.org> <208023.72012.qm@web52901.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
I ask the other way round: Why not? The new Summarits are smaller and more
affordable than Summicrons, with just a 2/3 stop slower aperture. I can
imagine they'll sell quite well. Me for instance could well imagine to buy
that 50. So the answer to your question might be "Leica making business"...
Didier
>Why the sumarit-M lens?
>Why, from a day to the other, a new set of lens to the M system?
Replies:
Reply from bernardofeio at yahoo.com.br (bernardo feio) ([Leica] Why the sumarit-M lens?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Why the sumarit-M lens?)
Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the sumarit-M lens?)
In reply to:
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Me and my M8)
Message from bernardofeio at yahoo.com.br (bernardo feio) ([Leica] Why the sumarit-M lens?)