Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Muir Lake Comparison
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Thu Aug 16 15:37:31 2007
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20070816180616.02535ba0@comporium.net>
 
I don't think that "processing them exactly the same way" is the way  
to compare files from two completely different chips; anymore than  
one would process two different films in the same way. I'm quite sure  
that you can achieve a similar "look" with the M8 file simply by  
adjusting in highlights, lights, darks and shadows, in curves. My M8  
experience would suggest that you have more micro-fine detail in that  
file than the 5D.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Aug 16, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> What do you think?  Leica or Canon?  M 21 or R 19?  I tried to  
> process them both exactly the same way.
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Muir Lake Comparison)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Muir Lake Comparison)
 In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Muir Lake Comparison)