Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/07/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] really ?
From: alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal)
Date: Wed Jul 11 20:20:45 2007
References: <079127B0-6331-4B23-8908-245D280037AE@cox.net><B6134470-6FAC-4C32-9598-96713697AAB9@mac.com><729A881A-4A11-4525-80CF-948F036DFCAE@cox.net><46950D74.9060102@mcclary.net> <20070712011334.GQ29997@panix.com> <a3f189160707111939wd02183ahc8624039e1b0c940@mail.gmail.com>
:-)
> On 7/11/07, Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> yes. forum, please.
>>
>
> Geez, you want us to take an intelligent conversation there? You gotta be
> kidding.
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> USA
In reply to:
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] really ?)