Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 bad pixel question?
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Tue Jul 10 05:59:24 2007
References: <82c9dd70707070445t450b2d01t1661f8c23784fa9d@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0707070541o1647648dwd3f3d4fa6e5f9344@mail.gmail.com> <82c9dd70707100546x2b75e68fqfd5f488479a2bb1d@mail.gmail.com>
 
On 7/10/07, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for calming me down. I have emailed Leica.
> I am sure they will say "send it in"
>
> I think it IS one blown pixel that the software is correcting.
> You can just barely see it in final 100% blowups in the shadows.
> I mean we are talking NO real world impact -- but a blown pixel is a blown
> pixel.
> And $4995 is well.. a lot of money.
>
> ARGH..
> Eric
>
>
Just think, 999,999 great pixels are left !

Are you a pirate?

-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA
Replies: Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)
 In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)