Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve Barbour showed: Subject: [Leica] horsemen and sand... >>first sand... >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/chelly/sand+bw.jpg.html >>now horseman... >>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/chelly/horseman_001.jpg.html Hi Steve I have to say I like both. But the sand photograph is the mover & shaker, far better than the rider and dog. WHY? The sand isn't too difficult to express ones like or dislike. First, there isn't any "dislike." ;-) The sand is a grabber right away with... "WOW look at the beautiful line of the dune! The perspective to the "village?" in the back ground. It's something special creating a fine art look to hang on the wall due to the feelings the enormous looking dune and slopes create. Another art gallery sale piece. Now the hard part! :-( Horeseman. Yep an interesting photograph, however not a grab you by the throat and shake you with the same WOW re-action to the "Sand Dune." It's the back lighting creating shadows in front of the rider.... a kind of visual block, also leaving his face in deep shadow. And I'd much rather see his face in sunlight. Personal preference. I absolutely understand the shot is a real life moment and no way to change light nor rider direction. Those things happen. But as I've said to myself under similar light conditions... "Damn, if it were only the other way!" Then shot it anyway just incase it looked OK in print or slide form. :-) Hey you never can tell what the finished product is going to look like until you're on the light table or screen. So always shoot then edit it later by swallowing hard. Your first rider and sheep photo is a far superior photograph compared to this. Sorry mate I call them as I see them. Better luck next time. :-) ted