Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Don wrote: > Chris and all, > The Chairman of Fuji is very emphatically pro film. After hearing > him speak > at several business conferences I believe it is both a personal > choice as > well as good for Fuji's business. Mostly on the printing side, he > continually makes the point that prints on Fuji's Crystal Archive > paper have > a very good color gamut, extremely long life, are the easiest way > to share > images, and fit the needs of the vast majority of the world's > citizens. > > At least as long as he is Chairman Fuji will be very much pro > analog. I > suspect based on space in Fuji's trade show floor that when he > retires that > will change a lot. My Kodak affiliated relatives keep telling me that film and paper are the cash cows of the photography business. They are the only aspects of the business that show a steady (although rapidly declining) profit. Since stockholders demand dividends, or at least positive results on the balance sheet, most photo companies are reluctant to abandon that side of the business. Kodak is an object lesson on what happens to a company that ignores the digital revolution for too long. Kodak holds a number of patents in digital photography, the new sensor being only one of them, but has been ambivalent about incorporating them into new cameras. The attitude of past management was that each digital camera sold decreased the value of the analog business. It was a difficult juggling act and they dropped the balls. It is primarily the electronic manufacturing companies, with no stake in the film business, that make any real money from digital photography. Larry Z