Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi LUGers The current edition of the UK magazine Amateur Photographer (known as AP in the UK) has a review of the "improved M8" by Damien Demolder who is also the current editor of the AP. I am an admirer of Damien's reviews which tend to be balanced and informed. I am still lurking on the M8 front so I read this review with interest. The "improved M8" is essentially the M8 with the latest firmware updates and IR filters. The review is something of a mixed bag. On the one hand Damien is critical of the internet clamour about the red casts and banding and he suggests even Canon had comparable teething problems. He continues "to their massive credit the people at Leica have openly acknowledged their faults and endeavoured to fix them". On the other hand, Damien laments the continued lack of support for SDHC cards and is critical of newly introduced starbust effects on various highlights. He suggests these "effects are not ugly but they shouldn't be there." In his conclusion, Damien describes the IR filters "like sticking a plaster over a wound that doesn't heal but stops bothering you", but goes on to say he became comfortable with the filters after some use. He suggests the AWB and JPEG mode are not as good as they could be and reaffirms his recommendation to use RAW to get the best out of the camera. I can finally note as an aside comment on one of his illustrations Damien suggests there "is still a bias towards the red channel in this camera, which makes for dramatic black and white conversions". As I suspect I am not the only one lurking at the sidelines and pondering if and when to buy a M8 perhaps M8 users or anyone with access to other commentators may like to respond to what I take to be a lukewarm review by Damien. Chris