Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/05/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Thu May 3 08:53:27 2007
References: <799FB5C68429B3F6ECF6E0D7@hindolveston.reid.org> <46399345.5060208@gmx.de><000d01c78d5d$23d90a90$6501a8c0@asus930> <4639A17E.9030806@gmx.de> <001301c78d63$8bd50260$6501a8c0@asus930> <1CBF3608-E6D6-4319-B7B0-E1160441A28F@cox.net>
I have no idea why almost no one is entering comments. Last month's contest
drew one comment on one photograph. This month it was none.
> I agree that the absence of discussion of the photos, and critiques from
> the judges, weaken a contest that has a lot of potential...
In reply to:
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Results of April 2007 LUG photo contest)