Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, it was shot at 1/125 at 1.4. I adjusted the exposure by 1 stop to generate the jpeg file. Strictly speaking, it's not an artifact of underexposure, but an artifact that was exaggerated by exposure compensation. On Thursday, April 26, 2007, at 07:28AM, "Sonny Carter" <sonc.hegr@gmail.com> wrote: >I was looking at the exif for the shot, and I note it was shot at 160 ISO >and a 1/125th of a second. My best hunch is that the artifact is from >underexposure.