Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 8:57 AM -0500 4/25/07, Harrison McClary wrote: >Ok...I am thinking about buying this lens. Do those of you who have >it like it? From what I have read it is a very nice little lens, >and I admit the radical POV of a 12 intrigues me. I have a 16 for >my EOS so I am not too interested in the VC 15, if I am going to go >wide, I want even wider than what I already have. > >Thanks for any input as to the quality/fun of this lens. If you >have some sample photos I'd love to see them also. > >-- >Harrison McClary Hi Harrison, I've had the 12 since it came out, and I also use the 12-24 Sigma on the 5D. Optically, the 12 is better except of course with respect to vignetting, but they are both fully useable. I've used the CV lens with a center filter at times (http://archiphoto.com/Various/RD1vignette/source/12.htm), but usually it gets used without. I don't have any pictures posted with the CV, but I do have a couple taken with the Sigma: http://archiphoto.com/Various/China/source/img_3145.htm http://archiphoto.com/Various/China/source/img_3550.htm Besides the usual architectural stuff I've also used the 12 CV for shooting wildlife. Birds in particular. Who needs those 560's? :-) In 2000 I was in the Galapagos, shortly after I got the lens. One local species, the red-footed booby perches mostly in bushes, and I mean 'in'. If you shoot from the outside you sometimes only get branches. So I took the camera with 12mm lens, set it on 18" or less, stuck the whole thing into the bush and took 'environmental portraits'. The birds might have been a bit put off by someone poking their hand into their bush, but they didn't move. I'll have to see if I can scan one of those shots. I don't remember how well they turned out, though. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com