Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 4/4/07 6:03 PM, "Tom Pastorello" <etruscello@yahoo.com> typed: > Mark, I stated I was sharing my experience that my > image results were more consistent with Schneider's > research than Puts' research. I did not say I did > scientific research. It is not the case either that I > took hand held snap shots and blew them up. I stated > the variety of conditions under which I took pictures. > I did not add, and should have, that all were taken > on tripod. I compared filtered and non-filtered shots > at all reasonable levels of magnification. The > filtered images, on PC and print, consistently > appeared to have higher overall contrast and sharpness > of fine detail at high magnification. The results of > the comparisons were consistent. It unlikely that I > may have shaken the tripod for all non-filtered shots > only. I evaluate an image on the basis of what I see. > If an instrument were to indicate that the > non-filtered shots were technically more contrasty, I > would still choose the image that appeared more > contrasty (if that's my desired effect.) I simply > wanted to share my experience and ask for others' > experiences with IR Cut filters. Tom > > > > The pictures you made how big? Or you used which loupe or microscope? I know nothing about snapshots by the way that wasn't me. And you figured you got better Micro-contrast how? Mark Rabiner 8A/109s New York, NY markrabiner.com