Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lottermoser George Subject: Re: [Leica] A good while ago >>Just for the record - I'm not presenting a "Digital v: Analogue" discussion. I totally embrace digital capture. Love it. My discussion intended only to address the economic considerations of digital; and the fact that, unless you're exposing 100's of rolls per month, digital capture does not make "economic" sense. It certainly makes a good deal of sense in a professional world which demands it; as well as for all of it's other ease of use pluses; not to mention the blending into our technological lives.<<< Hi George, I think people who are the weekend warriors of photography wouldn't be affected as much as those of us who do our picture taking as professionals. Obviously the amateur doesn't shoot 63 rolls of film in one day, let alone a month. So in that sense I can rationalize any economic switch to digital if one is only shooting a half dozen rolls a month or less. There is another factor we professionals have to consider to stay viable in the business community. That is the demands of.... "I need these pictures like yesterday, so transmit from location!" Alost a normal request these days. Actually my son Scott is transmitting his sports images as soon as they're shot so the client can up load the cream, "well I'm sorry but his work is all cream!" ;-) hey his father can say that. Right? ;-) Obviously if one is in business we're almost forced into digitallike it or not. But that's another thing if we're comparing the amateur group to the pros. ted