Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 6:22 PM -0400 3/13/07, Tina Manley wrote: >At 06:05 PM 3/13/2007, you wrote: >>Answers, please and thank you. "KISS!" don't forget I'm a >>photojournalist! Not a techie person. Therefore please keep your >>answers very simple. Thanks again. >> >>ted > >Ted, I sent my Noctilux off to be coded because my M8 was going to >Germany on vacation anyway and I asked them to check the focus on >the M8 with the Noctilux and then code the Noctilux. As far as I >know, it won't make any difference except when you view the photos >in Photoshop, or any other photo editing software, you will know >what lens was used at what aperture. I know a lot of people think >that is vital information but, normally, I couldn't care less; >however, in these days of digital files everybody wants to know what >lens you used on what camera at what exposures! That's no >exaggeration. Several of my stock agencies require this >information. As far as I'm concerned, they could just look at the >photo and determine if it meets their criteria but since they are >using photo editors who have exact parameters to meet and have never >looked at a whole photo and thought about its impact, that's what we >have to live with!! > >Tina Tina, the coding won't help with respect to aperture info. Only which lens was used. I'll get my 28mm and lower coded; possibly my 35 if I think I can be without it for a while. The cyan corners are _just_ noticeable at times. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com