Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 34, Issue 231: ASPH vs Aspherical
From: alex at vanhulsenbeek.com (Sander van Hulsenbeek)
Date: Sun Mar 11 10:16:36 2007
References: <200703111659.l2BGvZgi076892@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Frank Dernie wrote:

"AFAIK the Leica lenses which have ASPH rather than ASHPERICAL
engraved on them have hot pressed rather than ground aspherical
elements. This type of element is not too expensive and it can
simplify the rest of the lens design. I am guessing this is why the
new lens is less expensive than the one it replaces."

That not quite what I understood in Solms a little more than a year ago:

Aspherical lenses from Leica come in 2 varieties: hot-pressed and ground. 
The latter process is the more expensive, but the choice between them is 
just because of the size: there is a limit to the diameter for which 
aspherical lenses can be hot pressed.

So it is quite possible that the asherical lenses in big tele's, including 
the 90/2 ASPH, and perhaps the 75/2 are ground, while the smaller 
lenselements in the wide angles are hot-pressed.

However, the polishing and quality control process (with complicated wave 
interfererence lens testing machines) for both kinds is the same, and for 
the end result the way the glasselement  started its life is of no 
consequence. ASPH and ASHERICAL: it is all the same.

Yes, the hot-press to final lens process is cheaper, and that is reflected 
in the price of your lens. The lensquality should be the same for all.

Sander
Amsterdam
Holland





Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 34, Issue 231: ASPH vs Aspherical)