Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hoppy I fully agree, the e-400 is what I believe that can be successful on the market - truly compact (even if the APS-C sensored Pentax K100D with one of their Pancakes, 21mm, 40mm, 70mm, beats it). But the L1/Digilux-3 is more a "Wanna-be-big" thing, a Potemkin's DSLR, leading to a dead end IMO. Didier >Didier, I have no journalistic expertise nor pretensions. I'm absolutely >with you on the perception that four thirds cameras ought >to be compact alternatives to APS-C sensor DSLRs. I do understand the >basics of tele-centric lens, however I can't fathom why a user >might accept the limitations of the smaller sensor (noise, crop factor) >without gaining an apparent benefit in system compactness. >Perhaps I'm unduly influenced by a 35mm metal SLR upbringing. >Whatever the reality/performance, I think that Olympus is acknowledging >that perception with the E-400. I think only for Europe and >Aus so far? Truly OM like in dimensions. >Cheers >Analog Hoppy