Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon Feb 12 14:08:02 2007
 
On 2/12/07 4:25 PM, "Philippe Orlent" <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> typed:

> Another great suggestion that makes me change my choices again.
> If this continues I might buy an M8!
> ;-)
> Thanks, Mark.
> Much appreciated.
> Philippe
> 
> 
Yes well with an M8 a superwide zoom is not an option is it so maybe I'm
missing something in the compliment or its not one.
You do have the option though of using the wide Tri Elmar. A Leica M zoom.
With slight gaps between focal lengths which we can ignore.
And then that means you'd be on the LUG talking about shooting with Leica
glass and a Leica.
Instead of doing your Leica shooting with Canon glass and a Canon.
In in which the verisimilitude of Leica like shooting is left up to the
imagination. Which we all have plenty of anyway.

Mark Rabiner
New York, NY
40?47'59.79"N   
73?57'32.37"W

markrabiner.com
Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
 In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)