Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Sun Feb 11 12:25:16 2007
References: <3280493C-7263-4F11-BD0E-F63FE0ED2D6C@pandora.be><007501c74d5d$979db1a0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto><6860C641-C00D-4DA1-9767-3B943900A7C0@pandora.be><013e01c74e16$435242a0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <0745EB02-EFCB-4816-94AA-530EC2862860@pandora.be>
Did not open it yet. Yeah 12%! Found a store in Tampa that had it. I went in
for Guinness and Baileys.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Orlent" Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the
recurrent dilemma
> Scaldis is so obscure that you have to look for it even in Belgium.
> So that's quite a catch! Was it good? 12? can be quite hefty ;-)
> Philippe
>
>
> Op 11-feb-07, om 20:53 heeft Christopher Williams het volgende geschreven:
>
>> I found Hoegaarden White,St Bernardus, and Scaldis?
>>
>> And I realized I misspelled "Belgian" in my earlier post.
>> Chris
Replies:
Reply from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
In reply to:
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)