Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, I guess I have to look it up. Tomorrow evening I have some time. I'm sure the threads of the TE and the Hektor are different. Very helpful is the Leica accesoire book made bij Hove. I also have a lot of old catalog's which have a wealth of information on theses things. Cheers, Michiel Fokkema G Hopkinson wrote: > I've added to my own confusion here. The 135's that I have are the 4.0/135 > Elmar, 1960 and the 4.0/135 Tele-Elmar, 1965. The optical > cells are quite different in profile when I look at them side by side. The > Tele Elmar has one large thread and an inner smaller > thread. > So there must be completely different mounts/adaptors???? > The normal M bayonet presumably will allow fitting to the Visoflex II > without any adapting? Presumably that would work differently > to the optical cells and their relevant adaptors? > Sorry to be dense. I'm sure it will start to make more sense when I have > the Visoflex II in hand. I need to read a lot more on this. > > Cheers > Hoppy > > Cheers > Hoppy > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Michiel Fokkema > Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 09:56 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex help > > Hmm, > > I'm pretty sure the Hektor and Elmar use a different adapter. To make > sure I have to dive into my literature. >> Hoppy, >> The appropriate adaptor is 16464 which will work for: >> Tele-Elmar 135 f/4 (infin-1:5), >> Hector and Elmar 135 (infin - 1:5), >> 90 f/2.8 first version (infin -1:3.3), and >> 65 f/3.5 (infin -1:2.5). >> > > -- Best regards, Michiel Fokkema