Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 11, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Len wrote: > Thanks. I have the use of it (Telyt 560/f6.8) for the weekend along > with a R8 body. I > still find it hard to believe a simple 2 element lens can be that > good. I have a friend, a professor of optical physics, at the University of Rochester who insists that the sharpest long focal lenses have the fewest elements. The Telyt lens only covers a field of 3.5 degrees on a 35mm frame, 4.5 degrees on an M8 frame. With that narrow a field you don't need to worry about all the aberrations that multiple elements are required to correct. In fact, if you used a narrow band pass filter, a single element lens would be almost ideal. Obviously Leitz engineers agreed and the results confirm the theory. We need the multiple element ASPH designs because we insist on short focal length fast lenses for multicolored subjects at close ranges. The 42" Yerkes telescope, the biggest refractor telescope in the world is a two element achromatic. Larry Z