Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 1:32 PM -0600 1/11/07, Lottermoser George wrote: >Could you elaborate on this thought. > >Regards, >George Lottermoser >george@imagist.com > > > >On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Henning Wulff wrote: > >>pixel density of the 20D for telephoto stuff. The 20D is an 8mp camera, but compared with the 5D it has a smaller sensor by a factor of about 2.5 (somewhat less than 1.6 squared). So a full size sensor such as the 5D would need about 20mp to have the same number of pixels per square in. (pixel density) as the 20D. That means that if I take the 560 telyt and shot the same subject with the 20D and the 5D, and then crop the 5D image down to the same area as that of the 20D (to get the same angle of view), I'd wind up with 12.8/2.5 or about 5mp. So compared with what the 20D gives me in telephoto shots, shooting with the 5D is like shooting with a 5mp camera This means that shooting with the 20D gives me a small resolution advantage for telephoto shots. Also it's smaller, lighter, faster, and I can get more shots on a card. :-) The 5D is better for normal and wide shots, for dof control, low light etc, but the 20D has its place. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com